LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE TEACHING

LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE TEACHING

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

HOW DO I BOOST READING AND WRITING WHILE AT THE SAME TIME NURTURING THEIR ABILITY TO EXPRESS THEMSELVES MEANINGFULLY? (Summary)

Fostering reading and writing, while at the same time motivating our students the ability to express meaningfully, is not an easy task. When analyzing the implementation and the corresponding preparation of Reading and Writing Skills in the foreign language classroom, it is possible to affirm that the teacher does not give the correct amount of time and even less prepare what is going to be proposed to students. “Writing (for example) has been a neglected area of English language teaching for some years” (Maley 2010, p. 8) Moreover, the teachers are more worried about other issues in the language such as the Grammar or Vocabulary and little time to practice Listening or Speaking. But just at the end, and if there is time, he/she decides then to give a piece of paper with a lot of lines for students to write on or just make copies of a reading about celebrations, for example, that he/she got from a pop-up textbook or a web page in which comprehension questions are already set.
 
 There is no time”, “I have a lot of students”, “I don’t know what they like”, “anyway they don’t do anything” “this worksheet could work” “It is not too long/short” are the many different excuses a teacher gives just to support reasons why he/she does not teach Reading and Writing or just why he/she guides a mediocre process. What maybe we as teachers do not know is that if more organization is implemented at the moment of designing the materials and executing the activities in the classroom, we can guide a process to be proud of. With this perception of teaching Reading and Writing the teacher could be changing the students’ perspective towards the lessons by giving them the chance to be more enrolled in the process promoting meaningful participation.
 
Reading and writing are considered very important skills at the moment of communicating, it is so that when school starts the main concerns is to learn how to read and write. In order to foster students’ perceptions of meaning towards suggested Reading and Writing tasks in the classroom, it is vital for the learners to make sense on what has been implemented.
According to Tribble (1996) “writing means whereby a text is produced. It includes all of the preparatory work a writer does before beginning writing, as well as the work that he or she does while writing and during revising and editing” ( p. 161)  On the other side, Godman (1991) (Cited in Suleiman) affirms that “Reading is seen as an active process of comprehending [where] students need to be taught strategies to read more efficiently (e. g., guess from context, define expectations, make inferences about the text, skim ahead to fill in the context, etc.” (p. 143) Taking into account the definitions stated above, it is possible to say that Reading is not only the action of decoding words to find out a message neither Writing represents joining morphemes to convey a message. In fact they are really complex processes that need further attention and preparation from the teacher. If the teacher wants coherent Writing and Reading activities, it is important to take into account processes such as correlating the two skills into a circle of receiving and producing information, in other words, to implement a reading-to-write process as one of the strategies to show coherence by connecting topics and ideas.
 
 Furthermore, Reading is considered as a receptive skill and writing is a productive one. In this sense, regarding the concept of receptive skill (reading in this case) Cook (1998) (cited in Harmer) assures that “in order to make sense of any text, we need to have pre-existent knowledge of the world” (p. 251). Each of us carries in our heads mental representations of typical situations that we have come across during our life experiences and in that sense we have to catch the attention of our students to make the activities meaningful to them. As Jeremy Harmer claims, when we are stimulated by particular words, discourse patterns, or contexts, we employ our previous knowledge as we approach the process of comprehension, and we deploy a range of receptive skills (i.e. strategies) such as predicting, guessing, or interpreting. (p. 199)
 To conclude, to teach reading and writing skills definitely needs a lot of preparation from the teacher and a lot of commitment and interest from the student. It is not intended to be an easy process in which out of the blue students have to get involved and participate just because it is part of a task. To find students something interesting to read and write about means to implement activities that are coherent in the sense that they are not presented in an isolated way. Meaningful reading and writing represents a process introduced little by little with the appropriate activities, so students can feel that in fact there are links that make the process stronger and more comprehensible. Teaching Reading and Writing need to be connected in a logical and coherent way which is illustrated by the concept that language is a whole not a set of segregated items. Moreover, for students, Reading and Writing activities should give the sense of being useful at the moment of pursuing the possibility of expressing thoughts and ideas involving the things that happen to them every day (meaningful production). While teachers keep having the same old internet-designed worksheets or text-book activities for Reading and Writing without reflecting on the process, the students will not give one hundred percent of them and their lives in the procedure. Foster Reading and Writing activities involves being part of a serious and oriented process of steps and connections, so they teacher would have a blooming process that will open the door of fostering meaningful expressions that represent the honest voice of our learners.
 
 


The Power of Reading (A Krashen Conference report, Bogota, April 24th)


To start Krashen did a warm-up of his workshop talking about the concept of Comprehension Hypothesis. For Krashen, one way to acquire is to understand the information. The Comprehensible input can be as they "How they say" to "What they say" the canal of this process is the possibility of understand the input.

Krashen explained his point by starting saying that that The Comprehension Hypothesis and the Skill-based Hypothesis are rivals. The CH for Krashen provides the learner the opportunity to develop Literacy and Skills literacy while the SBH worried about the Grammar and Vocabulary to someday use the language.

Krashen continued his point saying that for the "Input" to be "meaningful" it is necessary to be interesting and get Ss' attention. For Krashen one of the main sources of Input is "Reading". However, for Krashen, a learner should read freely and for pleasure. Thanks to Free-voluntary Reading a learner can acquire vocabulary, learn spelling, and reflect on many other issues in the language.

For Krashen Volutary-reading and Reading for pleasure involves different issues such as Access to readings (libraries, internet etc), Massive and autonomous voluntary Reading, appealing material for the learners to get their attention on. The Power of Reading is represented by Reading for pleasure not as something mandatory. This concept makes Reading faster and pleasant. Moreover, it also impedes the Ss’ inclination for easy Reading. Besides, it is important to take advantage that we are living in a literature age where Young children and youngsters are faced to books such as "Harry Potter" and "Twilight".
Reading helps to get language-composition process strategies that lead to good writing and problem solving. Once more, the connection between Reading and Writing is eminent. So, according to Krashen from many advantages mentioned here and faced in the classroom Reading is a powerful tool that we sometimes take for granted, omit, forget or just let at the end of the teaching process.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Children Full of Life (Documentary)


We also have to learn to take care 

Regarding we have been talking about children development and language learning, I have to share this documentary with you guys. One part of this documentary was presented in the ASOCOPI workshop held last Friday (April 12th) The presenter  used the first part of this documentary with the idea of showing us the importance of Critical Thinking beyond the concept of cognition. Thinking critically for Professor Nancy Carvajal means going beyond than just analysing, enquiring, reflectinjg, observing and reasoning about the learning process. She showed us another way of thinking critically in order to foster our students involment in the process of learning a language, with the idea of making it meaningful to them. 


Everyday we come to our classroom with objectives, activities and processes already set. We as teachers try to involve our students into a process that much of the time is not meaningful to them. Students have to write, listen, talk and read about things that has nothing to do with their real lives. We just don't get to know our students beyond the person that is learning a particular topic in English. We forget about the "humanistic" characteristic of  the learner and then we complain because the students does not seem to be "connected" to the class. Maybe we haven't stopped and asked about the importance and meaningness of the activities implemented in the classroom. Students seem to be more involved in processes that touch their personal lives and why not? If we as humans are classifying things into relevant and irrelevant departing from the concept of significance. We want to learn something that help us understand the world. We have the power of engaging our students into the language tasks that are designed under the real-life basis. Dear colleagues, let's start our path to Critical Thinking.  

Note: I'm in love with a lot of things that have been implemented in Japan about education. It would be nice to start analysing those wonderful projects in that wonderful country. They're an example to follow.

Teaching Speaking: Power Point Presentation

ISSUES IN SPEAKING
SPEAKING AND PRONUNCIATION

PPT PRESENTATION
By
Johanna Leon
Angelica Murcia
Sergio Sanchez
Luz Helena Prada

Teaching Skills is not an isolated work



Teaching English as a foreign language EFL involves an interplay of elements such as the characteristics of the teacher, the learner, the setting, and the relevant languages (native and foreign). However, if these elements are not woven together effectively, the result will not be satisfactory. In addition to the elements mentioned above, other important fundamentals exist. In a practical sense, one of the most crucial of these fundamentals consists of the four primary skills of listening, reading, speaking, and writing. It also includes associated or related skills such as knowledge of vocabulary, spelling, pronunciation, syntax, meaning, and usage. When the four primary skills are not equally addressed in the classroom impedes a harmonious language development. Furthermore, the focus on exclusive receptive skill (which normally happens in the majority of institutions in Colombia) eliminates the possibility of students interacting with each other causing a problematic situation for language development and interpersonal relationships due to the fact that for language to develop successfully, learners must be in an environment that allows them to communicate socially in that language. This mode of instruction is known as the segregated-skill approach or the language-based approach as the focus of instruction is the language itself instead of learning for authentic communication. The skill element leads to optimal EFL communication when the skills are interwoven during instruction. This is known as the Integrated-Skill Approach.
The integrated-skills approach (ISA) incorporates the four language skills reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Yan-Chen Su points out the use of ISA to increase students’ understanding of the target language. Moreover, the author indicates that a wide range of authentic materials and integrated class activities allow students to interact lot better with each other changing students’ views on EFL instruction than otherwise. (27) In addition, constructing successful decoding skills entails the teaching and use of reading, writing, speaking and listening skills in the foreign language. In this sense, Marilyn Querejazu states that “a good foreign language teacher will separate confusing signals into their parts, show the correctly written words, explain the content and context and allow spoken and written practice. Receptive and productive communication skills are integrated; therefore the teaching of these skills is necessarily integrated.” For this reason, the present research is focused on how the four skills can be taught and practice in a coherent way and practiced together, making a distinction on the importance of one skill upon the other.
The final recommendation is to  try to expand our view of language as a set of particules or segregated elements. Skills as the word itself means is correlated to "the abilitiy of". We , as teachers, should stop thinking about teaching abilities as if our students were robots which need specific information to act in a certain way at exact moments. I think that it is possible to get a more hollistic view of language so we can act coherently to our view of language as something infinite, abstract, unique , big etc. Language is a whole and our students can see language as something that makes sense since it combines all together the functions and the notions needed to communicate effectively in foreign language.

References: 
Su, Yan-Chen. “Students’ Changing Views and the Integrated-Skills Approach
in Taiwan’s EFL College Classes.” Asian Pacific Education Review 8 (2007): 27-40.

Querejazu, Marilyn. Tesol Courses. September 8th, 2006